Peer Review Process

Publication of articles in Jurnal Perikanan Terpadu is dependent solely on scientific validity and coherence as judged by our editors and/or peer reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. Jurnal Perikanan Terpadu acknowledged the effort and suggestions made by its reviewers.

Publication of articles in Jurnal Perikanan Terpadu is dependent solely on scientific validity and coherence as judged by our editors and/or peer reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. Jurnal Perikanan Terpadu acknowledged the effort and suggestions made by its reviewers.

 

Initial evaluation of manuscripts

The Editor will first evaluate all manuscripts submitted at a maximum of 3 weeks time. Although rare, yet it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the Jurnal Perikanan Terpadu. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts reviewers for review. It usually took up to 2 weeks.

 

Type of peer review

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates the already published works, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The method is blind peer review.

 

Review reports

Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:

  • Is original by stating the objectives and gap clearly

  • Is methodologically research

  • Follows appropriate ethical guidelines

  • Has results/findings which are clearly presented and support the conclusions

  • Correctly references previous relevant work

  • Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.

 

Decision

Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor’s decision is final.

The response of the reviewers will be the basis for the Editor to conclude

Revisions Required
Accept Submission
Decline Submission
Resubmit Elsewhere

An article was rejected for publication due to various considerations, including:

The article does not fit the scope
The article does not follow the rules of writing scientific papers / do not follow the author's guidelines
The fundamental methodological errors
The author refuses to make suggestions for improvements provided by the reviewer without a logical basis.
There are indications of plagiarism of more than 25%