Pemaksimalan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Keimigrasian oleh PPNS (Studi Kasus Pt. Atrinco Mulia Sejati)

Ahmad Ady Majeng, M. Iman Santoso, Chairul Huda

Abstract


This study aims to find out the application of criminal investigations against corporations and the impact resulting from the implementation of immigration criminal investigations against corporations. The method used is normative-empirical and further deepened through the collection and processing of qualitative data. The results of this study indicate that PT. Atrinco Mulia Sejati was proven to have committed an immigration crime, namely he was unable to carry out his obligations as a guarantor and in decision No. 397/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Jkt.Ut sentenced Risnawati as a representative of PT. Atrinco Mulia Sejati and no other crimes were imposed apart from the corporation. In addition, there is an impact arising from the decision. Every court decision issued regarding an immigration crime can have a deterrent effect on perpetrators of criminal acts and prevent or suppress the possibility of the same crime being committed again, either by the same or a different subject. However, if you look at the facts on the ground, there are still forms of immigration violations committed by foreigners and the guarantor who guarantees the foreigner while in Indonesia does not know who the guaranteed foreigner is.

Keywords


Corporation; Guarantor; Criminal; Immigration; Foreigners; Criminal Investigation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antoni, Veri. “Konsistensi Penerapan Doktrin Piercing The Corporate Veil Pada Perseroan Terbatas Di Indonesia.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 3 (2013).

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.

Basrowi, Suwandi. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Perspektif Mikro, Surabaya.” Insan Cendikia, 2008.

Harahap, Putri Sari, and Tumanggor Tumanggor. “Penerapan Asas Piercing The Corporate Veil: Perspektif Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas.” Jurnal Nuansa Kenotariatan 1, no. 1 (2018): 45–51.

Leander, Jeffry. “Penerapan Doktrin Piercing Corporate The Veil Dalam Praktik Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (MARI)(Studi Putusan Perkara Nomor 1916 K/Pdt/1991 Dan Nomor 1311 K/Pdt) Tesis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara.” Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2017.

Moeljatno, S H. “Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana.” Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2002.

Muladi, D R, and D R Dwidja Priyatno. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi: Edisi Ketiga. Kencana, 2015.

Muladi, and Dwidja Priyanto. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi.” Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.

Nawawi, Arief Barda. “Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan Dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana.” Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1998.

Santoso, Iman. Perspektif Imigrasi Dalam United Nation Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime. Perum Percetakan Negara Republik Indonesia, 2021.

Sihombing, Sihar. “Hukum Keimigrasian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia.” Nuansa Mulia, Bandung, 2013.

Sutorius, R. “Arnhem, Alasan-Alasan Penghapus Kesalahan Khusus.” Penerjemah Wonosutanto),(Bandar Lampung: FH Unila, 1988), 1988.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v7i1.7315

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Ady Majeng, M. Iman Santoso, Chairul Huda

Flag Counter

 

free stats  

Jurnal Ius Civile
p-ISSN: 2614-5723  I  e-ISSN: 2520-6617  I  DOI: 10.35308
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Ujong Tanoh Darat, Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
(0655) 7110535 l +6282214066169 l +6285277034555
 is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International License