Kedudukan Electronic Documents Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Sengketa Kepabeanan Di Pengadilan Pajak

Azmi Fahri

Abstract


The Tax Court is a judicial body that exercises jurisdiction over Taxpayers or Tax insurers seeking justice in tax disputes, including customs disputes. Customs disputes are discrepancies in opinion or interpretation of statutory provisions, calculation, and determination of the amount of import duty, excise, and Import Tax that should be paid between Customs service users and the Directorate General of Customs and Excise. Along with the rapid progress of science and technology, the world is now entering the digital era. Thus, there is strong pressure on the law, including the law of evidence, to harmonize and follow developments in society. The research was conducted with a normative juridical approach, with the conclusion that in seeking material truth to resolve Customs disputes in the Tax Court, the Judge may request evidence from the Appellant in which all information regarding the import and export process is available on the application system of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise. Thus, all available electronic information can be printed and used as evidence in the Tax Court. In addition, the Tax Court adheres to the principle of free evidence, where the evidence can be in the form of letters or documents, expert statements, witness statements, confessions of the parties, and/or the knowledge of the judge.

Keywords


tax court; evidence; electronic documents

Full Text:

Untitled PDF

References


Ante, S. 2013. Pembuktian Dan Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Acara Pidana. Lex Crimen. 2 (2) : 98-104.

Army, E. 2020. Bukti Elektronik Dalam Praktik Peradilan. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Firdiansyah, A., Hasyim, W., dan Pahlevi, Y.A. 2018. Studi Kasus Penetapan Kembali Tarif Dan/Atau Nilai Pabean (SPKTNP) Oleh Direktur Jenderal Bea Dan Cukai: Tinjauan Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Ri. Jurnal Perspektif Bea Dan Cukai. 2 (2) : 20-34.

Girsang, J., Hutauruk, R.H., Tan, D., dan Sari, E.D. 2020. Analisis Yuridis Mengenai Pemberlakuan Surat Keterangan Asal (SKA) di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. 3 (3) : 230-243.

Hamdi, S. 2013. Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 1 (4): 25–31.

Hidayah, K. 2018. Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak. Setara Press.

Ispriyarso, B. 2018. Upaya Hukum Dalam Sengketa Pajak.

Administrative Law & Governance Journal. 1 (2) : 9-14.

Kurniawan, I. 2019. Sengketa Pengajuan Banding Terhadap Penetapan Nilai Kepabeanan Dalam Ekspor- Impor (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor : Put/52674/PP/M.XVIIA/19/2014 ). KRTHA BHAYANGKARA. 13 (2) : 208-222.

Lisnawati, E. 2017. Keabsahan Alat Bukti Elektronik Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.20/PUU-XVI/2016 Dalam Prespektif Criminal Justice System. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal). 5 (4) : 677-693.

Marwan, M., dan Jimmy, P. 2009. Kamus Hukum. Reality Publisher. Surabaya.

Pamungkas, H. 2011. Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak. Binus Business Review. 2 (1): 551-563.

Sa’adah, N. 2018. Tinjauan Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak Melalui Lembaga Keberatan. Administrative Law & Governance Journal. 1 (3) : 268-279.

Soerjono. 1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Wahyudi, T.H. 2020. Keberadaan Dan Peran Pengadilan Pajak Dalam Memberikan Keadilan Substantif Kepada Wajib Pajak. Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis (Selisik). 6 (1): 71-85.

Yusandy, T. 2019. Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Serambi Akademica. 7 (5): 645-656.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v6i2.5361

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Azmi Fahri

Flag Counter

 

free stats  

Jurnal Ius Civile
p-ISSN: 2614-5723  I  e-ISSN: 2520-6617  I  DOI: 10.35308
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Ujong Tanoh Darat, Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
(0655) 7110535 l +6282214066169 l +6285277034555
 is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International License