TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HAKIMYANG TIDAK LENGKAP (ONVOLDOENDE GEMOTIVEERD) DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA DI BAWAH ANCAMAN PIDANA MINIMAL DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 46/PID.SUS/2023/PN MRN)

Mia Ramadani

Abstract


The contents that must be contained in a court decision are regulated in the provisions of Article 50 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power and Article 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. A decision that does not meet these provisions is an incomplete decision or insufficient consideration (onvoldoende gemotiveerd). Meuredu District Court Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mrn is a decision in a narcotics crime case where the Defendant is subject to Article 112 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, the minimum penalty for which is 4 (four) years in prison. However, the Panel of Judges imposed a prison sentence under the minimum penalty, namely 2 (two) years in prison without stating and explaining the legal basis used as a reference in imposing a sentence under the minimum penalty. This research aims to find out and analyze whether the judge's considerations in Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mrn do not contain complete legal considerations and what are the legal consequences of the judge's decision whose considerations are incomplete. This research is a normative legal research using the statutory approach method and case approach. Data sources were obtained from literature review and secondary data, namely primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials which were analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that the judge's consideration in Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mrn, was an insufficient consideration because the judge did not include SEMA Number 3 of 2015 which is a legal basis that legitimizes judges to be able to deviate from the minimum criminal provisions in narcotics crimes. So that this decision does not create legal certainty and legal remedies need to be taken to be able to correct mistakes in the application of law by judges. These legal remedies are ordinary legal remedies or extraordinary legal remedies.

Keywords


Onvoldoende Gemotiveerd; Narcotics Crime; Judge.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Margono, 2019. Asas Kadilan Kemanfaatan & Kepastian Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim, Sinar Grafika, Yogyakarta.

Muhaimin, 2020. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram University Press, Mataram.

SufDasco Ahmad, M., S., Asrun, dan Rahmar Rosadi, A. 2021. Sejarah Peradilan Indonesia, IPB Press, Bogor.

Wardaningsih, N. 2019. Hukum dan Peradilan, ALPRIN, Semarang.

Sudaryanto, A. 2012. Tugas dan Peran Hakim dalam Melakukan Penemuan Hukum/Rechtvinding (I.C Penafsiran Konstitusi Sebagai Metode Penemuan Hukum), Jurnal Konstitusi, 1(1).

Usman, 2011, Perkembangan Teori dan Hukum Pidana, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, 1(2).

Widato, J. 2016, Penerapan Asas Putusan Hakim Harus Dianggap Benar (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013), Lex Jurnalica, 1 (13).

Wijayanta, T. 2014. Asas Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan dalam Kaitannya dengan Putusan Kepailitan Pengadilan Niaga, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 2 (14).

Universitas Medan Area, 2023. Apa Itu Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA), Artikel Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 143, Tambahan Lembaran Republik Indonesia Negara Nomor 5062).

Undang-Undang No. 48 tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 157, Tambahan Lembaran Republik Indonesia Negara Nomor 5076).

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2015 sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan.

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2010 Tentang Penempatan Penyalahgunaan, Korban Penyalahgunaan Dan Pecandu Narkotika Ke Dalam Lembaga Rehabilitasi Medis dan Rehabilitasi Sosial.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Meuredu Nomor 46/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mrn.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jjm.v3i2.14875

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Mia Ramadani