Analisis Political Ecology: Konflik PT GAG di Raja Ampat dan Marginalisasi Masyarakat Lokal Atas Sumber Daya Nikel
Abstract
This study examines the dynamics of environmental politics surrounding the controversy of PT Gag Nickel’s mining activities on Gag Island, Raja Ampat, West Papua. The case reflects the tension between Indonesia’s national economic development agenda, particularly nickel downstreaming policies, and environmental conservation efforts in a region with exceptionally high marine biodiversity. This research employs a qualitative approach using a case study method, supported by literature review and critical discourse analysis, to analyze power relations, state policies, and political-economic interests shaping natural resource governance. The findings indicate that mining policies on Gag Island are predominantly driven by state and corporate interests aligned with the national nickel downstreaming agenda, while ecological justice, environmental protection, and indigenous community participation tend to be marginalized. Regulatory overlaps between central and local governments, weak environmental law enforcement, and limited involvement of local communities further exacerbate environmental governance inequalities. This study underscores that environmental issues in Indonesia are not merely technical in nature but are deeply embedded in power structures that position the environment as a subordinate variable in economic development. Therefore, inclusive, transparent, and justice-oriented environmental governance reforms are essential to achieving sustainable development.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Andryandy, T., & Kuswanto, F. R. H. (2026). Analisis Gerakan # SaveRajaAmpat dalam Konsep Politicized Collective Identity. 5279–5289.
Bebbington, A., Abdulai, A.-G., Hinfelaar, M., Humphreys Bebbington, D., & Sanborn, C. (2018). Governing extractive industries: Politics, histories, ideas. Oxford University Press.
Bryant, R. L., & Bailey, S. (2015). Third world political ecology. Routledge.
Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven governance systems gain rule-making authority. GOVERNANCE, 15(4), 503–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00199
Dahrendorf, R. (2015). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press.
Fauzi, M. R., Hapsari, I. D., Jamaludin, M., Pendidikan, F., Ulama, U. N., Tengah, J., Info, A., Industry, M., Territories, I., & Paradigm, C. (2025). A Philosophical Critique of Anthropocentrism and Environmental Decolonization in Raja Ampat’s Indigenous Territories. 5(2).
Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. Routledge.
McCarthy, J. F., & Robinson, K. (2019). Land, economic development, social justice and environmental management in Indonesia: The search for the people’s sovereignty. Asian Studies Review, 40(3), 437–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2016.1199066
Pangestu, R., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Tambang nikel Raja Ampat: Ancaman keanekaragaman hayati atau ancaman pengangguran baru? Jurnal Kebijakan Lingkungan Indonesia, 5(12), 101–118.
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/jcpds.v12i1.14382
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Community : Pengawas Dinamika Sosial
ISSN 2477-5746 (cetak); ISSN 2502-0544 (online)
Prodi Sosiologi
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Teuku Umar
Meulaboh, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
email: jcommunityutu@gmail.com |sosiologi@utu.ac.id| http://sosiologi.utu.ac.id
________________________________________________________________________________
Community : Pengawas Dinamika Sosial dilisensikan dengan Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 .









