Integrating ChatGPT in Higher Education: Insights into Student Usage, Critical Thinking, and Independent Learning

Nizar Saputra, Asirah Asirah, Siska Eka Syafitri

Abstract


This study aims to investigate how university students use ChatGPT in academic contexts and how they perceive its influence on critical thinking and independent learning. Using a descriptive survey method, data were collected from 156 university students through a structured questionnaire covering ChatGPT usage frequency, academic purposes, and perceptions related to critical and independent thinking. The findings reveal that 98.1% of students utilize ChatGPT for academic tasks such as research, essay writing, and problem-solving, with most using it either occasionally (55.1%) or weekly (20.5%). Students reported that ChatGPT supports their ability to analyze information and generate ideas, with over half agreeing that it enhances critical thinking. However, a notable portion also expressed concerns about potential overreliance on AI, suggesting it may hinder independent thought and problem-solving skills. Based on these insights, the study recommends integrating AI literacy into higher education curricula to promote mindful, ethical, and strategic use of tools like ChatGPT. This approach can help students balance the benefits of AI with the development of their autonomous academic skills.


Keywords


ChatGPT; Higher Education; Critical Thinking; Independent Learning; Artificiall Intelligence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsubaie, M. A. (2024). ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use

Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy. Behavioral

Sciences, 14(9), 845-. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090845

Almassaad, A., Alajlan, H., & Alebaikan, R. (2024). Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Investigating Utilization, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. Systems, 12(10), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385

Bae, H., & Bozkurt, A. (2024). The Untold Story of Training Students with Generative AI: Are We Preparing Students for True Learning or Just Personalization? Online Learning, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4689

Bai, L., Liu, X., & Su, J. (2023). ChatGPT: The cognitive effects on learning and memory. Brain‐X, 1(3), e30. https://doi.org/10.1002/brx2.30

Baskara, Fx. R. (2025). Conceptualizing Digital Literacy for the AI Era: A Framework for Preparing Students in an AI-Driven World. Data and Metadata, 4, 530. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025530

Braun, H. I., Shavelson, R. J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Borowiec, K. (2020). Performance Assessment of Critical Thinking: Conceptualization, Design, and Implementation. Frontiers in Education, 5, 156. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00156

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Chen, K., Tallant, A. C., & Selig, I. (2025). Exploring generative AI literacy in higher education: student

adoption, interaction, evaluation and ethical perceptions. Information and Learning

Science, 126(1/2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2023-0160

Chinonso, O. E., Theresa, A. M.-E., & Aduke, T. C. (2023). ChatGPT for Teaching, Learning and Research: Prospects and Challenges. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(02), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2023.v05i02.001

Daher, W., & Hussein, A. (2024). Higher Education Students' Perceptions of GenAI Tools for

Learning. Information (2078-2489), 15(7).

Das, S. R., & J.V., M. (2024). Perceptions of Higher Education Students towards ChatGPT Usage. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.583

Dikilitaş, K., Furenes Klippen, M. I., & Keles, S. (2024). A Systematic Rapid Review of Empirical Research on Students’ Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education. Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.23865/njsre.v2.6227

Ding, F. (2017). ‘Free in Time, Not Free in Mind’: First-Year University Students Becoming More Independent. Journal of College Student Development, 58(4), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0045

Dong, Y., & Shi, L. (2021). Using Grammarly to support students’ source-based writing practices. Assessing Writing, 50, 100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100564

Dragojević, T., & Turudić, J. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in higher education: Students’ perceptions. Nastava i vaspitanje, 73(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2403315D

Etikan, I., Abubakar Musa, S., & Sanusi Alkasim, R. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Firat, M. (2016). Measuring the e-Learning Autonomy of Distance Education Students. Open Praxis, 8(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.310

Fu, Y. (2024). A research of the impact of ChatGPT on education. Applied and Computational Engineering, 35(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/35/20230354

Hadley, G., & Boon, A. (2022). Critical Thinking (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429059865

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education promises and

implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Hutson, J., Plate, D., & Berry, K. (2024). Embracing AI in English composition: Insights and innovations

in hybrid pedagogical practices. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(1), 19-31.

Islam, I., & Islam, M. N. (2024). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in academia. Discover Education, 3(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00114-w

Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G.

(2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for

education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274.

Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An

essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 100145.

Khojasteh, L., Kafipour, R., Pakdel, F., & Mukundan, J. (2025). Empowering medical students with AI

writing co-pilots: design and validation of AI self-assessment toolkit. BMC Medical

Education, 25(1), 159–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06753-3

Kim, S. C. (2023). Current status and future directions of AI utilization guidelines in universities.

Knowledge & Liberal arts (KL), 13, 11-44.

Kwon, J. (2024). Establishing Essential Guidelines for the Educational Use of Generative AI. Asia-

pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange (APJCRI), 683-693.

Lawasi, M. C., Rohman, V. A., & Shoreamanis, M. (2024). The Use of AI in Improving Student’s

Critical Thinking Skills. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 18, 366-370

Leighton, J. P., Cui, Y., & Cutumisu, M. (2021). Key Information Processes for Thinking Critically in Data-Rich Environments. Frontiers in Education, 6, 561847. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.561847

Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., & Darwis, A. (2023). Exploring

artificial intelligence in academic essay: higher education student's perspective. International

Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296.

Marchandot, B., Matsushita, K., Carmona, A., Trimaille, A., & Morel, O. (2023). ChatGPT: the next

frontier in academic writing for cardiologists or a pandora’s box of ethical dilemmas. European

Heart Journal Open, 3(2), oead007–oead007. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead007

Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023). Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms:

Five strategies, including prompts. The Wharton School Research Paper.

Nikolopoulou, K. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring Ways of Harnessing Pedagogical Practices with the Assistance of ChatGPT. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022489

Perry, K. H. (2012). What is Literacy? – A Critical Overview of Sociocultural Perspectives. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(1), 50–71.

Rozek, K. (2024). GPT MODELS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES. 729–734. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2024/5.1/s22.881

Sanusi, I. T., Agbo, F. J., Dada, O. A., Yunusa, A. A., Aruleba, K. D., Obaido, G., Olawumi, O., & Oyelere, S. S. (2024). Stakeholders’ insights on artificial intelligence education: Perspectives of teachers, students, and policymakers. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100212.

Saputra, N., Mulyani, & Asirah. (2024). Factors Affecting Indonesian University Students’ Participation in Synchronous vs Asynchronous Online English Classess: A Perceptual Analysis. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 10(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v10i1.5473

Schei, O. M., Møgelvang, A., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Perceptions and Use of AI Chatbots among Students in Higher Education: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies. Education Sciences, 14(8), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080922

Šedlbauer, J., Činčera, J., Slavík, M., & Hartlová, A. (2024). Students' reflections on their experience

with ChatGPT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1526-1534.

Shibani, A., Knight, S., Kitto, K., Karunanayake, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Sas, C., Mueller, F. F.,

Williamson, J. R., & Kyburz, P. (2024). Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students’

Written Assessment. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in

Computing Systems, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3651083

Silva, A. D. O., & Janes, D. D. S. (2022). The Emergence of ChatGPT and its Implications for Education and Academic Research in the 21st Century. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3, e06. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v3i00.6

Xu, X., Su, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., & Xu, X. (2024). Understanding learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A thematic analysis of peer interviews among undergraduates and postgraduates in China. Heliyon, 10(4), e26239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26239

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35308/ijelr.v7i1.11928

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Nizar Saputra, Asirah Asirah, Siska Eka Syafitri

p-ISSN : 2721-429X
e-ISSN : 2721-4273

Published by Language Center of Universitas Teuku Umar
Website : http://jurnal.utu.ac.id/IJELR
Email    : ijelr@utu.ac.id

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.